|
|
Post by Berlin on Jul 31, 2004 15:13:32 GMT
Its true, for eg. spiderman 2 was chessy cos it was meant for young teenage girls. if it was a 15 there cud have been better fights and stuff
|
|
|
|
Post by Phil Seaman on Jul 31, 2004 16:05:38 GMT
crap mark. many examples of this : lord of the rings, shrek etc
|
|
|
|
Post by Ok Computer on Jul 31, 2004 18:26:07 GMT
yeh mark ill level with u this is a load of bullshit
|
|
|
|
Post by Casper on Jul 31, 2004 19:31:07 GMT
 ahh, they're Donna's fav films! But yes, ur right Phil, not all films rated less than 15certificate are crap. Violence doesnt always make a good film.
|
|
|
|
Post by Berlin on Aug 1, 2004 21:50:14 GMT
lord of the rings is crap, harry potter is and shrek is ok i suppose
|
|
|
|
Post by Ok Computer on Aug 1, 2004 22:11:24 GMT
what about the bond films mark there all pg or 12 except for licence to kill
|
|
|
|
Post by Bruce on Aug 14, 2004 14:59:43 GMT
Th bond films r ok, but a bit 2 preditable
|
|
|
|
Post by Berlin on Aug 17, 2004 14:06:03 GMT
the bond films arent that gd tho
|
|
|
|
Post by SomeoneShexay on Aug 31, 2004 9:48:27 GMT
[glow=pink,2,300] Excuse me Shrek and Finding Nemo are both sheer strokes of genius !  ....although I must admit one of my fav films has to be Kill Bill vol.1 which is an 18.... ;D[/glow] |
|
ahh, they're Donna's fav films! But yes, ur right Phil, not all films rated less than 15certificate are crap. Violence doesnt always make a good film.
....although I must admit one of my fav films has to be Kill Bill vol.1 which is an 18.... ;D[/glow]